Circular
No. 13 of 2015
F. No. 142/18/2015-TPL
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
(TPL Division)
***
Dated 6th of July, 2015
F. No. 142/18/2015-TPL
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
(TPL Division)
***
Dated 6th of July, 2015
Clarifications
on Tax Compliance for Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets
The
Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act,
2015 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) has introduced a tax compliance
provision under Chapter VI of the Act. The Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign
Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Rules, 2015 (hereinafter referred to
as ‘the Rules’) have been notified. In regard to the scheme queries have been
received from the public about the scope of the scheme and the procedure to be
followed. The Board has considered the same and decided to clarify the points
raised by issue of a circular in the form of questions and answers as follows.-
Question
No.1: If firm has undisclosed foreign assets, can the partner file declaration
in respect of such asset?
Answer:
The declaration can be made by the firm which shall be signed by the person
specified in sub-section (2) of section 62 of the Act. The partner cannot make
a declaration in his name. However, the partner may file a declaration in
respect of an undisclosed asset held by him.
Question
No.2: Where a company has undisclosed foreign assets, can it file a declaration
under Chapter VI of the Act? If yes, then whether immunity would be granted to
Directors of the company?
Answer:
Yes, the company can file a declaration under Chapter VI of the Act. The
Directors of the company shall not be liable for any offence under the
Income-tax Act, Wealth-tax Act, FEMA, Companies Act and the Customs Act in
respect of declaration made in the name of the company.
Question
No.3: Whether immunity in respect of declaration made under the scheme is
provided in respect of Acts other than those mentioned in section 67 of the
Act?
Answer:
Section 67 provides immunity from prosecution under the five Acts viz. the
Income-tax Act, Wealth-tax Act, FEMA, Companies Act and the Customs Act. It
does not provide immunity from prosecution under any other Act. For example- if
the undisclosed asset has been acquired out of the proceeds of sale of
protected animals the person will not be eligible for immunity under the
Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.
Question
No.4: Whether the person making the declaration will be provided immunity from
the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002?
Answer:
The offence under the PMLA arises while laundering money generated from the
process or activity connected with the offences specified in the schedule to
the PMLA. Therefore, the primary requirement under PMLA is commission of a
scheduled offence. With the enactment of the Act, the offence of wilful attempt
to evade tax under section 51 of the Act has become a scheduled offence under
PMLA. However, where a declaration of an asset has been duly made under section
59 of the Act the provisions of section 51 will not be applicable in respect of
that asset. Therefore, PMLA will not be applicable in respect of the scheduled
offence of wilful attempt to evade tax under section 51 of the Act in respect
of assets for which declaration is made under section 59 of the Act.
Question
No.5: Where an undisclosed foreign asset is declared under Chapter VI of the
Act and tax and penalty is paid on its fair market value then will the
declarant be liable for capital gains on sale of such asset in the future? If
yes, then how will the capital gains in such case be computed?
Answer:
Yes, the declarant will be liable for capital gains under the Income-tax Act on
sale of such asset in future. As per the current provisions of the Income-tax
Act, the capital gains is computed by deducting cost of acquisition from the
sale price. However, since the asset will be taxed at its fair market value the
cost of acquisition for the purpose of Capital Gains shall be the said fair
market value and the period of holding shall start from the date of declaration
of such asset under Chapter VI of the Act.
Question
No.6: Where a notice under section 142/ 143(2)/ 148/ 153A/ 153C of the
Income-tax Act has been issued to a person for an assessment year will he be
ineligible from voluntary declaration under section 59 of the Act?
Answer:
The person will only be ineligible from declaration of those foreign assets
which have been acquired during the year for which a notice under section 142/
143(2)/ 148/ 153A/ 153C is issued and the proceeding is pending before the
Assessing Officer. He is free to declare other foreign assets which have been
acquired during other years for which no notice under above referred sections
have been issued.
Question
No.7: As per section 71(d)(i), declaration cannot be made where an undisclosed
asset has been acquired during any previous year relevant to an assessment year
for which a notice under section 142, 143(2), 148, 153A or 153C of the
Income-tax Act has been issued. If the notice has been issued but not served on
the declarant then how will he come to know whether the notice has been issued?
Answer:
The declarant will not be eligible for declaration under Chapter VI of the Act
where an undisclosed asset has been acquired during any previous year relevant
to any assessment year where a notice under section 142, 143(2), 148, 153A or
153C of the Income-tax Act has been issued and served on the declarant on or
before 30th day of June, 2015. The declarant is required to file a declaration
regarding receipt of any such notice in Form 6.
Question
No. 8: Where an undisclosed foreign asset has been acquired partly during a
previous year relevant to the assessment year which is pending for assessment
and partly during other years not pending for assessment then whether such
asset is eligible for declaration under Chapter VI of the Act?
Answer:
In the case where proceedings are pending before an Assessing Officer in
pursuance of a notice under section 142, 143(2), 148, 153A or 153C of the
Income-tax Act served on or before 30-06-2015, the declarant may declare the
undisclosed asset under Chapter VI of the Act. However, while computing the
amount of declaration the investment made in the asset during the previous year
relevant to the assessment year for which such notice is issued needs to be
deducted
from
the fair market value of the asset for which the person shall provide a
computation alongwith the declaration. Further, such investment which is
deducted from the fair market value shall be assessable in the assessment of
the relevant assessment year pending under the Income-tax Act and the person
shall inform the Assessing Officer the investment made during the relevant year
in such asset.
Also
to clarify, where a notice under section 142, 143(2), 148, 153A or 153C of the
Income-tax Act is issued on or after 30-06-2015, the declarant shall be
eligible to declare full value of asset even if such asset (or part of such
asset) is acquired in the previous year relevant to the assessment year for
which such notice is issued.
Question
No.9: Can a declaration be made of undisclosed foreign assets which have been
assessed to tax and the case is pending before an Appellate Authority?
Answer:
As per section 65 of the Act, the declarant is not entitled to re-open any
assessment or reassessment made under the Income-tax Act. Therefore, he is not
entitled to avail the tax compliance in respect of those assets. However, he
can voluntarily declare other undisclosed foreign assets which have been
acquired or made from income not disclosed and consequently not assessed under
the Income-tax Act.
Question
No.10: Can a person against whom a search/ survey operation has been initiated
file voluntary declaration under Chapter VI of the Act?
Answer:
(a) The person is not eligible to make a declaration under Chapter VI if a
search has been initiated and the time for issuance of notice under section
153A has not expired, even if such notice for the relevant assessment year has
not been issued. In this case, however, the person is eligible to file a
declaration in respect of an undisclosed foreign asset acquired in any previous
year in relation to an assessment year which is prior to assessment years
relevant for the purpose of notice under section 153A.
(b)
In case of survey operation the person is barred from making a declaration
under Chapter VI in respect of an undisclosed asset acquired in the previous
year in which the survey was conducted. The person is, however, eligible to
make a declaration in respect of an undisclosed asset acquired in any other
previous year.
Question
No. 11: Where a search/ survey operation was conducted and the assessment has
been completed but the undisclosed foreign asset was not taxed, then whether
such asset can be declared under Chapter VI of the Act?
Answer:
Yes, such undisclosed asset can be declared under Chapter VI of the Act.
Question
No.12: Whether a person is barred from voluntary declaration under Chapter VI
of the Act if any information has been received by the Government under DTAA?
Answer:
As per section 71(d)(iii), the person cannot make a declaration of an
undisclosed foreign asset where the Central Government has received an
information in respect of such asset under the DTAA. The person is entitled for
voluntary declaration in respect of other undisclosed foreign assets for which
no information has been received.
Question
No.13: How would the person know that the Government has received information
of an undisclosed foreign asset held by him which will make the declaration
ineligible?
Answer:
The person may not know that the Government has information about undisclosed
foreign asset held by him if the same has not been communicated to him in any
enquiry/proceeding under the Income-tax Act. After the person has filed a
declaration, which is to be filed latest by 30th September, 2015, he will be
issued intimation by the Principal Commissioner/Commissioner by 31th October,
2015, whether any information has been received by the Government and
consequently whether he is eligible to make the payment on the declaration
made. If no information has been received up to 30th June, 2015 by the
Government in respect of such asset the person will be allowed a time upto 31st
December, 2015 for payment of tax and penalty in respect of the declared asset.
There
may be a case where person makes declaration in respect of 5 assets whereas the
Government has information about only 1 asset. In such situation the person
will be eligible to declare the balance 4 assets under Chapter VI of the Act.
In such case the declarant, on receipt of intimation by the Principal
Commissioner/Commissioner, shall revise the declaration made within 15 days of
such receipt of intimation to exclude the asset which is not eligible for
declaration. Tax and penalty on the eligible assets under the Act shall be
payable in respect of the revised declaration by 31st of December, 2015. In
respect of the ineligible assets provisions of the Income-tax Act shall apply.
(Please also see answer to question no. 15)
Question
No.14: What are the consequences if no declaration under Chapter VI of the Act
is made in respect of undisclosed foreign assets acquired prior to the
commencement of the Act?
Answer:
As per section 72(c), where any asset has been acquired prior to the
commencement of the Act and no declaration under Chapter VI of the Act is made
then such asset shall be deemed to have been acquired in the year in which it
comes to the notice of the Assessing Officer and the provisions of the Act
shall apply accordingly.
India
is expected to start receiving information through Automatic Exchange of
Information (AEOI) route under FATCA from USA later in the year 2015. Further,
under the multilateral agreement India will start receiving information from
other countries under AEOI route from 2017 onwards. As at 18th March 2015, 58
jurisdictions (including India) have committed to share information under AEOI
by 2017 and 36 jurisdictions have committed to share by 2018, including
jurisdictions which have beneficial tax regime. The multilateral agreement is
expected to cover all the countries in the near future. The information under
the AEOI will include information of controlling persons (beneficial owners) of
the asset. The possibility of discovery of an undisclosed asset may arise at
any time in the future; say for example, information of an immovable property
can be unearthed if any utility bills/property tax or even gardener’s/
caretaker’s salary has been paid through an existing or closed bank account.
Therefore, if any information of an undisclosed foreign asset acquired earlier,
say in the year 1975, for $ 100,000 comes to the notice of an Assessing Officer
later, say in the year 2020, when its value becomes, say, $ 5 Million, the
liability under the Act amounting to 120 percent of the fair market value of
the asset on the valuation date may arise in the year 2020, besides prosecution
and other consequences. In this case if the valuation date is in the year 2020
the amount of tax and penalty under the Act will be $ 6 Million.
Question
No.15: If a declaration of undisclosed foreign asset is made under Chapter VI
of the Act and the same was found ineligible due to the reason that Government
had prior information under DTAA then will the person be liable for
consequences under the Act?
Answer: In respect of such assets which have been duly declared in good faith under the tax compliance but not found eligible, he shall not be hit by section 72(c) of the Act and no action lies in respect of such assets under the Act. However, such information may be used for the purpose of the Income-tax Act.
Answer: In respect of such assets which have been duly declared in good faith under the tax compliance but not found eligible, he shall not be hit by section 72(c) of the Act and no action lies in respect of such assets under the Act. However, such information may be used for the purpose of the Income-tax Act.
Question
No.16: In respect of the undisclosed foreign assets referred to in answer to
question No. 15 above, where the proceedings under the Income-tax Act are
initiated, can the options of settlement commission etc. under the Income-tax
Act be availed in respect of such assets?
Answer:
All the provisions of the Income-tax Act shall be applicable in respect of
those assets.
Question
No.17: A person has some undisclosed foreign assets. If he declares those
assets in the Income-tax Return for assessment year 2015-16 or say 2014-15 (in
belated return) then should he need to declare those assets in the voluntary
tax compliance under Chapter VI of the Act?
Answer:
As per the Act, the undisclosed foreign asset means an asset which is
unaccounted/ the source of investment in such asset is not fully explainable.
Since an asset reported in Schedule FA does not form part of computation of
total income in the Income-tax Return and consequently does not get taxed, mere
reporting of a foreign asset in Schedule FA of the Return does not mean that
the source of investment in the asset has been explained. The foreign asset is
liable to be taxed under the Act (whether reported in the return or not) if the
source of investment in such asset is unexplained. Therefore, declaration
should be made under Chapter VI of the Act in respect of all those foreign
assets which are unaccounted/ the source of investment in such asset is not
fully explainable.
Question
No.18: A person holds certain foreign assets which are fully explained and
acquired out of tax paid income. However, he has not reported these assets in
Schedule FA of the Income-tax Return in the past. Should he declare such assets
under Chapter VI of the Act?
Answer:
Since, these assets are fully explained they are not treated as undisclosed
foreign assets and should not be declared under Chapter VI of the Act. However,
if these assets are not reported in Schedule FA of the Income-tax Return for
assessment year 2016-17 (relating to previous year 2015-16) or any subsequent
assessment year by a person, being a resident (other than not ordinarily
resident), then he shall be liable for penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs under section 43
of the Act. The penalty is, however, not applicable in respect of an asset
being one or more foreign bank accounts having an aggregate balance not exceeding
an amount equivalent to Rs. 5 lakhs at any time during the previous year.
Question
No.19: A person has a foreign bank account in which undisclosed income has been
deposited over several years. He has spent the money in the account over these
years and now it has a balance of only $500. Does he need to pay tax on this
$500 under the declaration?
Answer:
Section 59 of the Act provides for declaration of an undisclosed asset and not
income. In this case the Bank account is an undisclosed asset which may be
declared. Tax on undisclosed asset is required to be paid on its fair market
value. In case of a bank account the fair market value is the sum of all the
deposits made in the account computed in accordance with Rule 3(1)(e).
Therefore, tax and penalty needs to be paid on such fair market value and not
on the balance as on date.
Question
No. 20: A person held a foreign bank account for a limited period between
1994-95 and 1997-98 which was unexplained. Since such account was closed in
1997-98 does he need to declare the same under Chapter VI of the Act?
Answer:
Section 59 of the Act provides that the declaration may be made of any
undisclosed foreign asset which has been acquired from income which has not
been charged to tax under the Income-tax Act. Since the investment in the bank
account was unexplained and was from untaxed income the same may be declared
under Chapter VI of the Act. The consequences of non-declaration may arise
under the Act at any time in the future when the information of such account
comes to the notice of the Assessing Officer.
Question
No.21: A person inherited a house property in 2003-04 from his father who is no
more. Such property was acquired from unexplained sources of investment. The
property was sold by the person in 2011-12. Does he need to declare such
property under Chapter VI of the Act and if yes then, what will be the fair
market value of such property for the purpose of declaration?
Answer:
Since the property was from unexplained sources of investment the same may be declared
under Chapter VI of the Act. However, the declaration in this case needs be
made by the person who inherited the property in the capacity of legal
representative of his father. The fair market value of the property in his case
shall be higher of its cost of acquisition and the sale price as per Rule 3(2)
of the Rules.
Question
No.22: A person acquired a house property in a foreign country during the year
2000-01 from unexplained sources of income. The property was sold in 2007-08
and the proceeds were deposited in a foreign bank account. Does he need to
declare both the assets under Chapter VI of the Act and pay tax on both the
assets?
Answer:
The declaration may be made in respect of both the house property and the bank
account at their fair market value. The fair market value of the house property
shall be higher of its cost and the sale price, less amount deposited in bank
account. If the cost price of the house property is higher the declarant will
be required to pay tax and penalty on (cost price – sale price) of the house.
If the sale price of the house property is higher the fair market value of the
house property shall be nil as full amount was deposited in the bank account.
The fair market value of the bank account shall be as determined under Rule
3(1)(e) and tax and penalty shall be paid on this amount. (Please also refer to
the illustration under Rule 3(3) for computation of fair market value.)
Further,
it is advisable to declare all the undisclosed foreign assets even if the fair
market value as computed in accordance with Rule 3 comes to nil. This may avoid
initiation of any inquiry under the Act in the future in case such asset comes
to the notice of the Assessing Officer.
Question
No.23: A person is a non-resident. However, he was a resident of India earlier
and had acquired foreign assets out of income chargeable to tax in India which
was not declared in the return of income or no return was filed in respect of
that income. Can that person file a declaration under Chapter VI of the Act?
Answer:
Section 59 provides that a declaration may be made by any person of an
undisclosed foreign asset acquired from income chargeable to tax under the
Income-tax Act for any assessment year prior to assessment year 2016-17. Since
the person was a resident in the year in which he had acquired foreign assets
(which were undisclosed) out of income chargeable to tax in India, he is
eligible to file a declaration under section 59 in respect of those assets
under Chapter VI of the Act.
Question
No.24: A person is a resident now. However, he was a non-resident earlier when
he had acquired foreign assets (which he continues to hold now) out of income
which was not chargeable to tax in India. Does the person need to file a
declaration in respect of those assets under Chapter VI of the Act?
Answer:
No. Those assets do not fall under the definition of undisclosed assets under
the Act.
Question
No. 25: If a person has 3 undisclosed foreign assets and declares only 2 of
those under Chapter VI of the Act, then will he get immunity from the Act in
respect of the 2 assets declared?
Answer: It is expected that one should declare all his undisclosed foreign assets. However, in such a case the person will get immunity under the provisions of the Act in respect of the two assets declared under Chapter VI of the Act and no immunity will be available in respect of the third asset which is not declared.
Answer: It is expected that one should declare all his undisclosed foreign assets. However, in such a case the person will get immunity under the provisions of the Act in respect of the two assets declared under Chapter VI of the Act and no immunity will be available in respect of the third asset which is not declared.
Question
No. 26: A resident earned income outside India which has been deposited in his
foreign bank account. The income was charged to tax in the foreign country when
it was earned but the same was not declared in the return of income in India
and consequently not taxed in India. Does he need to disclose such income under
Chapter VI of the Act? Will he get credit of foreign tax paid?
Answer:
Declaration under Chapter VI is to be made of an undisclosed foreign asset. In
this case, the person being a resident of India, the foreign bank account needs
to be declared under Chapter VI as it is an undisclosed asset and acquired from
income chargeable to tax in India. The fair market value of the bank account
shall be determined as per Rule 3(1)(e). No credit of foreign taxes paid shall
be allowable in India as section 84 of the Act does not provide for application
of sections 90(1)(a)/90(1)(b)/ 90A(1)(a)/ 90A(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act
(relating to credit of foreign tax paid) to the Act. Further, section 73 of the
Act does not allow agreement with foreign country for the purpose of granting
relief in respect of tax chargeable under the Act.
Question
No. 27: Can a person declare under Chapter VI his undisclosed foreign assets
which have been acquired from money earned through corruption?
Answer:
No. As per section 71(b) of the Act, Chapter VI shall not apply, inter-alia, in
relation to prosecution of any offence punishable under the Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988. Therefore, declaration of such asset cannot be made under
Chapter VI. However, if such a declaration is made and in an event it is found
that the asset represented money earned through corruption it would amount to
misrepresentation of facts and the declaration shall be void under section 68
of the Act. If a declaration is held as void, the provisions of the Act shall
apply in respect of such asset as they apply in relation to any other
undisclosed foreign asset.
Question
No. 28: If a foreign asset has been acquired partly out of undisclosed income
chargeable to tax and partly out of disclosed income/exempt income (tax paid
income) then whether that foreign asset will be treated as undisclosed? Whether
declaration under Chapter VI needs to be made in respect of such asset? If yes,
what amount should be disclosed?
Answer:
As per section 5 of the Act, in computing the value of an undisclosed foreign
asset any income which has been assessed to tax under the Income-tax Act from
which that asset is acquired shall be reduced from the value of the undisclosed
foreign asset. Only part of the investment is such foreign asset is undisclosed
(unexplained) hence declaration of such foreign asset may be made under Chapter
VI of the Act. The amount of declaration shall be the fair market value of such
asset as on 1st July, 2015 as reduced by the amount computed in accordance with
section 5 of the Act.
Question
No. 29: Whether for the purpose of declaration, the undisclosed foreign asset
should be held by the declarant on the date of declaration?
Answer:
No, there is no such requirement. The declaration may be made if the foreign
asset was acquired out of undisclosed income even if the same has been disposed
off and is not held by the declarant on the date of declaration.
Question
No. 30: Whether at the time of declaration under Chapter VI, will the Principal
Commissioner/Commissioner do any enquiry in respect of the declaration made?
Answer:
After the declaration is made the Principal Commissioner/ Commissioner will
enquire whether any information has been received by the competent authority in
respect of the asset declared. Apart from this no other enquiry will be
conducted by him at the time of declaration.
Question
No. 31: A person is a beneficiary in a foreign asset. Is he eligible for
declaration under section 59 of the Act?
Answer:
As far as ownership is concerned, as per section 2(11) of the Act “undisclosed
asset located outside India” means an asset held by the person in his name or
in respect of which he is a beneficial owner. The definition of “beneficial
owner” and “beneficiary” is provided in Explanation 4 and Explanation 5 to
section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, respectively (which is at variance with
the determination of beneficial ownership provided under Rule 9(3) of the PMLA
(Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005). Therefore, for the purpose of the Act
“beneficial owner” in respect of an asset means an individual who has provided,
directly or indirectly, consideration for the asset for the immediate or future
benefit, direct or indirect, of himself or any other person. Further,
“beneficiary” in respect of an asset means an individual who derives benefit
from the asset during the previous year and the consideration for such asset
has been provided by any person other than such beneficiary. Therefore, as per
the Act the beneficial owner is eligible for declaration under section 59 of
the Act.
There
may be a case where a person is listed as a beneficiary in a foreign asset,
however, if he has provided consideration for the asset, directly or
indirectly, he will be covered under the definition of beneficial owner for the
purposes of the Act.
Question No. 32: A person was employed in a foreign country where he acquired or made an asset out of income earned in that country. Whether such asset is required to be declared under Chapter VI of the Act?
Answer:
If the person, while he was a non-resident in India, acquired or made a foreign
asset out of income which is not chargeable to tax in India, such asset shall
not be an undisclosed asset under the Act.
However,
if income was accrued or received in India while he was non-resident, such
income is chargeable to tax in India. If such income was not disclosed in the
return of income and the foreign asset was acquired from such income then the
asset becomes undisclosed foreign asset and the person may declare such asset
under Chapter VI of the Act.

No comments:
Post a Comment